We've tried AI already and it didn't stick. Why would this be different?
Most AI that doesn't stick was pointed at the wrong workflow, or handed over as a tool nobody owned. I start with the workflow that actually limits the business, build it in your real tools and data, and train your team alongside so it lives in-house. The goal isn't a pilot. It's a workflow that keeps running after I leave.
Do you just advise, or do you actually build?
I build. Diagnosis is where we start, but the value is a working workflow shipped end to end, in your real tools and data. You get something running, not a strategy deck.
How long does it take?
It depends on the workflow, but engagements run in weeks, not quarters. The diagnostic is a single conversation. The first build is scoped to ship something useful fast, then we extend from there.
What does it cost?
It depends on the scope of what's worth building, which is exactly what the diagnostic conversation is for. That call is where we find out if there's a fit and what the work actually is.
What about our data and privacy?
Everything runs in your environment: your tools, your accounts. Nothing leaves your systems without your say-so, and I build so your team can see and run exactly what's happening. No black box.
Is this only for technical teams?
No. The point is that the capability lives with your team, technical or not. I build it to be run by the people who own the workflow, and they learn it alongside the build.
What happens after, are we stuck with you?
No, by design. Your team learns the build as it happens, so you can run and extend it without me. I stay involved for as many builds as make sense, not because you're locked in.